Skip to main content
    Utility data room showing geospatial energy savings across a city-wide housing stock
    HomeIQ — Rapid Program Design

    Design retrofit programs that actually get delivered.

    HomeIQ analyzes an entire housing stock to determine how many homes qualify for heat pumps and other upgrades, which properties to target, what rebates to offer, what budget is required and what the program can achieve.

    Current State

    Lightspark Score

    50/100
    Fair
    178GJ / year

    Energy Use

    9.2tCO2e / year

    Carbon Emissions

    Future State

    Lightspark Score

    80/100
    Excellent
    80GJ / year

    Energy Use

    3.4tCO2e / year

    Carbon Emissions

    Current State

    Annual Cost

    $2,653

    10-Year Cost

    $26,533

    Modeled Bill Load

    100%
    Future State

    Annual Cost

    $1,064

    10-Year Cost

    $10,640

    Modeled Bill Load

    40%

    Budget is rarely the constraint.

    The constraint is a delivery chain built from many vendors, a dozen disconnected tools, and 33 steps between awareness and a completed retrofit. Lightspark's Rapid Program Design replaces the guesswork with modelled offerings — and one system to deliver them.

    The problem

    Typical Energy Efficiency Programs are built like a maze

    Oftentimes, a utility rebate program routes homes through at least 7 of 9 disconnected phases — awareness, eligibility, product ID, contractor sourcing, pre-audit, install, reporting, application, and payout. Each phase is often a different team, tool, or organization.

    33

    steps end to end

    14–29

    active hours required

    3–18

    months elapsed

    ~97–98%

    cumulative abandonment

    The bottleneck isn't installation. It's every disconnected step that happens before a contractor ever shows up.

    The problem

    A typical program runs on six separate vendors

    Program design, marketing, implementation, evaluation, rebate processing, and financing are each typically procured, contracted, and run as separate systems — often by separate companies.

    Program Design & Consulting

    Portfolio strategy, goal-setting

    Marketing & Outreach

    Customer acquisition, campaigns

    Implementation Contractor

    Audits, installs, field delivery

    EM&V (Evaluation)

    Independent savings verification

    Rebate & Incentive Processing

    Applications, QA/QC, payment

    Trade Ally & Financing Network

    Contractor network, loan products

    30–40% of budget → outsourced, disconnected delivery

    Source: E Source research on outsourced energy-efficiency spending, cited in NRECA/TechSurveillance Directory of Energy Efficiency Implementation Contractors.

    Even inside one consultancy

    The tools don't talk to each other, either

    It's not just that utilities juggle six vendors. Each vendor juggles its own patchwork of point solutions just to deliver the work — an audit tool, a separate reporting platform, a separate rebate tracker.

    The same data, entered two or three times

    When one of the industry's own audit-software vendors announced an integration with a separate reporting platform, they described the problem plainly: contractors nationwide often have to enter the same audit data two or three times to satisfy different program and reporting systems.

    — Snugg Home, on its EnergySavvy reporting integration

    Point solutions, bolted together by acquisition

    Even large implementation contractors don't build one platform — they acquire separate point tools and stitch them together. Franklin Energy, one of the industry's largest implementation contractors, acquired audit-software vendor Snugg Home in 2024 specifically to fill a gap in its own delivery stack.

    — Franklin Energy / Snugg Pro, company history

    Fragmentation isn't just a market structure problem. It's baked into how individual programs get delivered day to day — by design, not by accident.

    The real numbers

    What it actually costs to run an efficiency program

    Independent research on hundreds of U.S. utility programs shows where the money already goes — before adding a single new vendor.

    2.4¢/kWh

    average levelized cost for program administrators to save a kilowatt-hour, across 2,100+ program-years of data

    $24

    average utility spending per customer on efficiency incentives nationally — ranging from $0 to $128 depending on the state

    ~2×

    the total cost of a saved kilowatt-hour once participant contributions are counted — roughly double the program-administrator-only figure

    None of this is the measures' fault. It's the cost of coordinating delivery across a fragmented vendor stack — the part Engage actually fixes.

    Sources: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Cost of Saving Electricity through Energy Efficiency Programs Funded by Utility Customers (2009–2018 data) and The Total Cost of Saving Electricity (participant + administrator costs); U.S. Energy Information Administration, EIA-861 survey (2016).

    What Rapid Program Design does for a Retrofit Program

    From offering design to trade matching, every step is designed to convert interest into measured outcomes — and structured data for your reporting.
    • Turns an address into a modelled home in minutes, with no truck roll
    • Converts model output into ranked, costed, rebate-netted bundles
    • Routes committed homeowners to vetted trades
    • Captures every step as structured program data
    Inside HomeIQ

    Design an offering, see the outcome

    HomeIQ's Rapid Program Design builds each income-banded offering in HomeIQ: upgrade bundles by dwelling type, existing versus proposed rebate, budget split — and the carbon, energy and cost outcomes recalculated as you tune it. Then when you've analyzed the program design, we configure Engage to the design, and we have a digital concierge for the delivery of the program to homeowners.

    HomeIQ
    homeiq.lightspark.ai/housing-stock/map
    Housing stockCity map
    Carbon score
    Energy score
    Income
    Dwelling type

    London, Ontario

    Carbon score overlay · 18,420 dwellings analyzed

    Export
    HomeIQ city-scale housing stock map with carbon and energy score overlays
    Housing stock summary
    18,420
    Dwellings
    2.6
    Average occupancy
    $78,400
    Median household income
    3.1 tCO2e
    Carbon score (avg)
    94 GJ/yr
    Energy score (avg)
    72
    Lightspark score (avg)
    Design a program from this stock
    How it works

    From housing stock to a program you can deliver

    1. 01

      Analyze the housing stock

    2. 02

      Identify qualifying homes

    3. 03

      Model upgrade bundles

    4. 04

      Set rebates and budget

    5. 05

      Project program impact

    The solution

    Meet Engage: one system, seven minutes

    Digital Home Survey

    Guided questions about heating, envelope, and comfort — no paperwork, no site visit to start.

    Instant Score Dashboard

    Energy, carbon, and comfort scores benchmarked against 5M+ North American homes, with a clear savings estimate.

    Personalized Recommendations

    Upgrades ranked by cost, rebate value, and 10-year savings — tailored to the property.

    Trade Network Match

    Homeowners connect directly with qualified local contractors to move straight into installation.

    Proven in the real world
    If we are really going to scale energy retrofits across North America, we need to use machine learning and AI to identify highest energy and carbon using buildings, develop retrofit programs, and support homeowners in making wise decisions. I've joined Lightspark as an advisor because their technology is best in class and can play a critical role in helping cities, utilities, homeowners, and others to reduce energy and carbon emissions in our existing buildings. We need to massively scale-up retrofits and use cutting-edge approaches – Lightspark will be key in doing that.
    Portrait of Sadhu Johnston

    Sadhu Johnston

    former City Manager and Deputy City Manager, City of Vancouver; former Chief Environmental Officer, City of Chicago